NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP.

No. 5:98-CV-1039.

436 F.Supp.2d 398 (2006)

NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION; the King Service, Inc.; United States Steel Company; Edwin D. King; Lawrence King; Richard B. Slote; Chevron U.S.A., Inc.; Portec, Inc.; and American Premier Underwriters, Inc.; Defendants. Chevron, U.S.A., INC., Third-party Plaintiff, v. The County of Rensselaer; and the County of Rensselaer Sewer District No. 1, Third-party Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. New York.

June 28, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (John T. Parkinson, Esq., Managing Counsel, of Counsel), Syracuse, NY, Swidler, Berlin, L.L.P. (Milissa A. Murray, Esq., Thomas R. Lotterman, Esq., of Counsel), Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.

Menter, Rudin & Trivelpiece, P.C. (Thomas Joseph Fucillo, Esq., of Counsel), Syracuse, NY, for Defendant Consolidated Rail Corporation.

Friedman, Hirschen, Miller & Campito (John L. Orfan, of Counsel), Albany, NY, Richard P. Feirstein, Albany, NY, for Defendants King Service, Inc., Edwin D. King, Lawrence King, and Richard B. Slote.

USX Corporation, (David L. Smiga, Esq., of Counsel), Pittsburgh, PA, Devorsetz, Stinziano, Gilberti, Heintz & Smith, P.C. (Kevin C. Murphy, Esq., Timothy J. Lambrecht, Esq., of Counsel), Syracuse, NY, for Defendant United States Steel Company.

Lafave & Associates (Patrick J. Higgins, Esq., of Counsel), Delmar, NY, for Defendant and Third-party Plaintiff Chevron U.S.A., Inc.

Bond, Schoeneck & King (Arthur J. Siegel, Esq., Kimberlee S. Parker, Esq., of Counsel), Albany, NY, for Defendant Portec, Inc.

Orrick & Herrington (James J. Capra, Jr, Esq., Siobhan A. Handley, Esq., of Counsel), New York City, for Defendant American Premier Underwriters, Inc.

Office of Rensselaer County Attorney (Stephen A. Pechenick, Esq., of Counsel), Troy, NY, for Third-party County Defendants.


MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER

HURD, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On May 10, 2005, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a Mandate remanding this matter for consideration in light of Cooper Indus., Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc., 543 U.S. 157, 125 S.Ct. 577, 160 L.Ed.2d 548 (2004). The Mandate was filed on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases