BRIGHTON v. BOROUGH OF RUMSON


23 N.J. Tax 60 (2006)

CHRISTOPHER S. BRIGHTON AND AVERY BRIGHTON, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BOROUGH OF RUMSON, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 28, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gil D. Messina, argued the cause for appellants (Messina & Laffey, attorneys; Mr. Messina and Michael P. Laffey, on the briefs).

Martin M. Barger, argued the cause for respondent (Reussille, Mausner, Carotenuto, Barger, Kenny & Steel, attorneys; Mr. Barger, on the brief).

Before Judges CUFF, PARRILLO and HOLSTON, JR.


PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs, Christopher S. Brighton and Avery Brighton, appeal the February 4, 2005 judgment of the Tax Court of New Jersey, affirming the judgment of the Monmouth County Board of Taxation, affirming the denial by the Borough of Rumson assessor of plaintiffs' application to have their 6.167 acre property at 60 Rumson Road valued, assessed and taxed as farmland for the 2002 tax year.

Plaintiffs assert that their own testimony and the testimony of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases