1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 369 S.C.
  5. 369 S.C. 462 (2006)
 

GOLDMAN v. RBC, INC.

No. 26178.

369 S.C. 462 (2006)

632 S.E.2d 850

David W. GOLDMAN and Emilie E. Goldman, Respondents, v. RBC, INC., Petitioner.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided July 3, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Edward Bell, III, of Sumter, for Petitioner.

Kristi F. Curtis, of Sumter, for Respondents.

Justice BURNETT:

RBC, Inc. (Petitioner) challenges the Court of Appeals' decision affirming the circuit court judge's ruling quieting title to a strip of land containing an abandoned railway in David W. Goldman and Emilie E. Goldman (the Goldmans). We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 1846, the General Assembly, anxious to encourage the building of railroads, granted a liberal charter by statute to the Wilmington & Manchester Railroad...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases