1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 47 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 47 Cal.Rptr.3d 780 (2006)
 

ANCHOR LIGHTING v. SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON

No. B184613.

47 Cal.Rptr.3d 780 (2006)

142 Cal.App.4th 541

ANCHOR LIGHTING, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One.

August 30, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul G. Kerkorian; Fresno; Berding & Weil, Daniel L. Rottinghaus and Steven R. Weinmann, Alamo, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Brian A. Cardoza, Bruce A. Reed and Richard D. Arko, Rosemead, for Defendants and Respondents.

VOGEL, J.

In the late 1990's, the Legislature compelled electricity suppliers to reduce their rates for residential and certain small commercial customers, and the Public Utilities Commission was empowered to implement the program. The case before us is pursued by Anchor Lighting, a customer that did not qualify for Southern California Edison's 10 percent rate reduction for its small commercial customers. The trial court concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to consider...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases