Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant challenges his conviction of murder in the second degree (see Penal Law § 125.25 [2]). He argues, inter alia, that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish that he acted with a depraved indifference to human life. Rather, contrary to the statements he made in his second videotaped statement, the defendant contends that this act evinced an intent to kill (see People v Payne,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.