Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the defendant's contentions, the trial court, in its September 4, 2003 order, properly granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, while ordering a hearing on the issue of damages. In response to the plaintiff's prima facie showing that a $5,406,503 reduction in the sale price of the parties' supermarket business was not authorized by the parties' marital settlement agreement...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
