1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 52 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 52 Cal.Rptr.3d 762 (2006)
 

PEREZ v. RICHARD ROE 1

No. B182814.

52 Cal.Rptr.3d 762 (2006)

146 Cal.App.4th 171

Cristin PEREZ et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. RICHARD ROE 1 et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Eight.

December 27, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Furtado, Jaspovice & Simons and Richard J. Simons, Hayward; Law Offices of Joseph George and Joseph George Sr., Sacramento; Law Offices of Daniel U. Smith and Daniel U. Smith, Kentfield, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Kiesel, Boucher & Larson, William L. Larson, Beverly Hills, for Sandra Graves as Amicus Curiae on behalf Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Neumiller & Beardslee and Paul N. Balestracci, Stockton; McNamara, Dodge, Ney, Beatty, Slattery & Pfalzer, and Thomas G. Beatty, Walnut Creek, for Defendants and Respondents.

RUBIN, J.

Plaintiffs Cristin Perez and Daniel Howard appeal from the judgment dismissing their childhood sexual abuse complaint against The Roman Catholic Bishop of Stockton because the statute purporting to revive their previously dismissed complaints violated California's constitutional separation of powers doctrine. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Cristin Perez and Daniel Howard sued the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases