1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 146 P.3d
  5. 146 P.3d 664 (2006)
 

TWIN FALLS v. CITIES OF TWIN FALLS & FILER

Nos. 30889-30891.

146 P.3d 664 (2006)

In re Idaho Code 1-2218. TWIN FALLS COUNTY, Petitioner-Respondent, v. CITIES OF TWIN FALLS AND FILER, Idaho; Cities of Kimberly and Hansen, Idaho; and City of Buhl, Idaho, Respondents-Appellants.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Twin Falls, November 2005 Term.

October 5, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wonderlich & Wakefield, Twin Falls, for appellants Cities of Twin Falls and Filer, Idaho. Fritz A. Wonderlich argued.

Hollifield Law Office, Twin Falls, for appellants Cities of Kimberly and Hanson, Idaho. William R. Hollifield argued.

Hepworth, Lezamiz & Janis, Chtd., Twin Falls, for appellant City of Buhl, Idaho. William L. Nungester appeared.

Grant P. Loebs, Twin Falls County Prosecuting Attorney, Twin Falls, for respondent. Jennifer R. Gose-Eells argued.

TROUT, Justice.

This case arose after Twin Falls County (County) asked the cities of Twin Falls, Kimberly, Hansen, Filer, and Buhl (Cities) to increase their contributions to the County for the Cities' proportionate use of the County's courthouse facilities. The district judges ordered the Cities to pay a portion of the costs of operating the magistrate's division located within the County's courthouse. Because we conclude...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases