1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 34 A.D.3d
  5. 34 A.D.3d 774 (2006)
 

NYCTL 1999-1 TRUST v. NY PRIDE HOLDINGS, INC.

34 A.D.3d 774 (2006)

825 N.Y.S.2d 521

NYCTL 1999-1 TRUST et al., Respondents, v. NY PRIDE HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Defendants, and UNION STREET MANAGEMENT GROUP, LTD., Appellant. BARODA PROPERTIES, INC., et al., Proposed Intervenors-Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided November 28, 2006.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant's motion to vacate the foreclosure sale. The appellant failed to establish that "a substantial right of a party was prejudiced" by the mere irregularities in the notice of sale (see RPAPL 231 [6]; Key Corporate Capital v Lindo, 304 A.D.2d 620 [2003]; Amresco New England II v Denino, 283...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases