Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the appellant's motion to vacate a prior judgment of that court. The arguments advanced by the appellant did not constitute grounds for relief under either CPLR 5015 (a) or pursuant to the Supreme Court's inherent discretionary power to exercise control over its own judgments (see Matter of McKenna v County of Nassau, Off. of County Attorney,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.