1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.3d
  4. 7 N.Y.3d
  5. 7 N.Y.3d 797 (2006)
 

SCHROEDER v. KALENAK PAINTING & PAPERHANGING, INC.

7 N.Y.3d 797 (2006)

854 N.E.2d 1268

821 N.Y.S.2d 804

KAREN A. SCHROEDER, Appellant, v. KALENAK PAINTING & PAPERHANGING, INC., et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Decided August 29, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The Barnes Firm, P.C., Rochester (Sareer A. Fazili of counsel), for appellant.

Burke, Albright, Harter & Reddy, LLP, Rochester (Robert J. Burke of counsel), for Kalenak Painting & Paperhanging, Inc., respondent.

Sugarman Law Firm, LLP, Syracuse (Sandra L. Holihan of counsel), for Morris Massry, respondent.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges G.B. SMITH, CIPARICK, ROSENBLATT, GRAFFEO, READ and R.S. SMITH concur.

OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff concedes that wallpapering is not an enumerated activity under the Labor Law (see Labor Law § 240 [1]). Moreover, plaintiff fails to allege sufficient facts to establish that her work was part of a larger renovation project subject to coverage under the statute (see Martinez v City of New York, 93 N.Y...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases