1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 460 F.Supp.2d
  5. 460 F.Supp.2d 340 (2006)
 

MACLEOD v. PROCTER & GAMBLE DISABILITY BEN. PLAN

No. 3:05CV725 (MRK).

460 F.Supp.2d 340 (2006)

Carl S. MACLEOD, Plaintiff, v. The PROCTER & GAMBLE DISABILITY BENEFIT PLAN, The Proctor & Gamble Co., and P & G-Clairol, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

November 6, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark C. Durkin, Durkin & Polera, PC, Stamford, CT, for Plaintiff.

Amy L. Van Dyke, Updike, Kelly & Spellacy, P.C., Hartford, CT, Christopher L. Brigham, Updike, Kelly & Spellacy, P.C., New Haven, CT, John J. Myers, Eckert, Seamans, Cherin & Mellott, Pittsburgh, PA, for Defendants.

RULING AND ORDER

KRAVITZ, District Judge.

This is an appeal of a denial of Mr. Macleod's application for disability benefits from the Proctor & Gamble Disability Benefit Plan (the "Plan"), in which he was enrolled when Proctor & Gamble ("P & G") acquired the Clairol facility of Mr. Macleod's then-employer, Bristol Meyers. Pending before the Court are Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases