We reject defendant's claim that two of his burglary convictions, which were also crimes underlying his enterprise corruption conviction, were based on legally insufficient evidence and were against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury's determinations concerning credibility. There was extensive evidence that tended to connect defendant to these crimes and fully satisfied the accomplice corroboration requirement (see CPL 60.22 [1];...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
