PUBLISHED IN PART OPINION
HUNT, J.
¶ 1 James Allenbach appeals his forgery and second degree identity theft convictions. He argues that (1) the identity theft definition statute, RCW 9.35.005(1), is unconstitutionally vague in its definition of "financial information"; (2) the trial court erred in admitting evidence of Allenbach's drug habit and drug debt as his reason for presenting the forged check; (3) the trial court erred by instructing the jury...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
