1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 25 A.D.3d
  5. 25 A.D.3d 762 (2006)
 

IORIZZO v. MATTIKOW

25 A.D.3d 762 (2006)

807 N.Y.S.2d 663

PAUL IORIZZO et al., Respondents, v. ALFRED MATTIKOW et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

January 31, 2006.

Ordered that the appeal by the defendants Drexel Construction Corp. and Charles I. Alfred Building Corp. is dismissed, as those parties are not aggrieved by the judgment (see CPLR 5511); and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiffs.

The plaintiffs demonstrated sufficient cause as to why this action should not be dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3215 (c), and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases