1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 142 P.3d
  5. 142 P.3d 623 (2006)
 

MITCHELL v. PEMCO MUT. INS. CO.

No. 55834-0-I.

142 P.3d 623 (2006)

Norm MITCHELL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellant, v. PEMCO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and Pemco Insurance Company, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

August 28, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William D. Brandt, Salem, OR, Simon Henri Forgette, Attorney at Law, Kirkland, WA, Mark E. Griffin, Griffin McCandlish, Portland, OR, for Appellant.

Harry J.F. III Korrell, Michael Reiss, Eric B. Martin, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

COLEMAN, J.

¶ 1 Norm Mitchell is the representative in this class-action suit against his employer, PEMCO. Mitchell alleged that the three categories of claims adjusters in the class were improperly classified as administrative employees exempt from overtime pay. PEMCO conceded that one type of adjuster was not exempt, and the court found that the other adjusters — casualty and property adjusters — in the class were properly classified as exempt...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases