1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 445 F.Supp.2d
  5. 445 F.Supp.2d 314 (2006)
 

WRIGHT v. EASTMAN KODAK CO.

Nos. 04-CV-6332L, 04-CV-6333L.

445 F.Supp.2d 314 (2006)

Kenneth WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, Defendant. Gary Thompson, Plaintiff, v. Eastman Kodak Company, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. New York.

August 22, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Van Henri White, Law Office Of Van White, Rochester, NY, for Plaintiffs.

Susan C. Roney, Nixon Peabody LLP, Buffalo, NY, for Defendant.

DECISION AND ORDER

LARIMER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, Kenneth Wright and Gary Thompson, commenced these actions against their employer, Eastman Kodak Company ("Kodak"), alleging that Kodak has discriminated against them on account of their race in violation of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 2000e-5, and the New York State Human Rights Law, Exec. L. § 296.1 Kodak has moved for partial summary judgment dismissing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases