ENZO BIOCHEM, INC., et al., Plaintiff(s),
v.
AMERSHAM PLC, et al., Defendant(s).
Enzo Biochem, Inc., et al., Plaintiff(s),
v.
Molecular Probes, Inc., et al., Defendant(s).
Enzo Biochem, Inc., et al., Plaintiff(s),
v.
Perkinelmer, Inc., et al., Defendant(s).
Enzo Biochem, Inc., et al., Plaintiff(s),
v.
Orchid Biosciences, Inc., et al., Defendant(s).
Enzo Biochem, Inc., et al., Plaintiff(s),
v.
Sigma-Aldrich Corporation, et al., Defendant(s).
Affymetrix, Inc., Plaintiff(s),
v.
Enzo Biochem, Inc., et al., Defendant(s).
Enzo Life Sciences, Inc., et al., Plaintiff(s),
v.
Affymetrix, Inc., Defendant(s).
Roche Diagnostics GMBH, et al., Plaintiff(s),
v.
Enzo Biochem, Inc., et al., Defendant(s).
United States District Court, S.D. New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
July 10, 2006.
July 10, 2006.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Greenberg Traurig, LLP, New York, NY (William G. Todd, Scott J. Bornstein, of counsel), for Plaintiffs Enzo Biochem, Inc. and Enzo Life Sciences, Inc.
Latham & Watkins, LLP, New York, NY (Robert J. Gunther, Jr., Daiske Yoshida, James P. Barabas, Sean R. Nowak, of counsel), for Defendants Affymetrix, Inc., Roche Diagnostics GmbH, and Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.
Bryan Cave, LLP, New York, NY (Stephen M. Haracz, Kevin Hooper, Charles Weiss, of counsel), for Defendants Sigma-Aldrich Corporation, Sigma Chemical Company, Inc., Sigma-Aldrich, Co., and Sigma-Aldrich, Inc.
Howrey Simon Arnold & White, Washington, DC (Matthew Wolf, Jennifer S. Sklenar, of counsel), for Defendants Amersham PLC and Amersham Biosciences.
Fish & Richardson, P.C., New York, NY (Richard P. Ferrara, of counsel), for Defendant Molecular Probes, Inc. Citigroup Center.
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, LLP, New York, NY (Nels T. Lippert, William G. McElwain, of counsel), for Defendants Perkinelmer, Inc. and Perkinelmer Life Sciences, Inc.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., Boston, MA (Joseph H. Hameline, Timur E. Slonim, of counsel), for Defendant Orchid Biosciences, Inc.
United States District Court, S.D. New York.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
At issue before the Court are the proper interpretations of fifteen claims covering eight different patents. Pursuant to this Court's function under Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc.,517 U.S. 370, 372, 116 S.Ct. 1384, 134 L.Ed.2d 577 (1996), the following shall constitute the constructions of the relevant claims.
BACKGROUND
The patents at issue...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
