1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 40 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 40 Cal.Rptr.3d 34 (2006)
 

ANDAL v. CITY OF STOCKTON

No. C049104.

40 Cal.Rptr.3d 34 (2006)

137 Cal.App.4th 86

Kari ANDAL et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF STOCKTON, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

February 28, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary, David Colker and David F. Gross, San Francisco, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson, Joseph M. Quinn, Oakland, K. Scott Dickey; Richard E. Nosky, Jr., City Attorney, John Leubberke, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Respondent.

DAVIS, Acting P.J.

In this declaratory relief action, plaintiffs allege that a local government fee imposed by the defendant City of Stockton (the City) is unconstitutional because it was not submitted for voter approval.1 The City successfully demurred to the action, contending that plaintiffs had failed to exhaust their administrative remedies. The City also claims that certain plaintiffs (the cell phone service companies) lack standing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases