1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 461 F.Supp.2d
  5. 461 F.Supp.2d 279 (2006)
 

CHIN v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORP.

Civil Action No. 95-5569 (JCL).

461 F.Supp.2d 279 (2006)

David CHIN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

November 9, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allyn Zissel Lite, Lite, Depalma, Greenberg and Rivas, LCC, Newark, NJ, Paul J. Linker, Gruhin & Gruhin, Esqs., Nutley, NJ, for Plaintiffs.

Thomas R. Curtin, Graham, Curtin & Sheridan, PC, Morristown, NJ, Frank P. Arleo, Arleo & Donohue, LLC, West Orange, NJ, for Defendant.

OPINION

LIFLAND, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' motion for attorneys' fees under California Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5. The question presented is whether Plaintiffs' class-action lawsuit was a material factor motivating Defendant DaimlerChrysler Corporation's ("Chrysler") voluntary decision to recall vehicles installed with defective anti-lock braking systems ("ABS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases