1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.3d
  4. 7 N.Y.3d
  5. 7 N.Y.3d 730 (2006)
 

PEOPLE v. SERRANO

7 N.Y.3d 730 (2006)

850 N.E.2d 1151

818 N.Y.S.2d 175

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JUAN SERRANO, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Decided June 8, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Center for Appellate Litigation, New York City (Carol A. Zeldin and Robert S. Dean of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York City (Grace Vee and David M. Cohn of counsel), for respondent.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges G.B. SMITH, CIPARICK, ROSENBLATT, GRAFFEO, READ and R.S. SMITH concur.

OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by calling 44 people for simultaneous voir dire questioning.

Defendant was arrested during a buy-and-bust operation in June 2001 for selling heroin. He was convicted of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]). At the start of jury selection, the trial court called 44...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases