1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 720 N.W.2d
  5. 720 N.W.2d 15 (2006)
 

LORIX v. CROMPTON CORP.

No. A05-2148.

720 N.W.2d 15 (2006)

Diane LORIX, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellant, v. CROMPTON CORPORATION, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

August 22, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Garrett D. Blanchfield, Jr., Frances E. Baillon, Reinhardt Wendorf & Blanchfield, St. Paul, MN, for appellant.

Michael A. Lindsay, Michael Skoglund, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, and James S. Simonson, Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett PA, Minneapolis, MN, and Ian Simmons, Benjamin G. Bradshaw, O'Melveny & Myers, LLP, and J. Andrew Read, Jones Day, Washington, D.C., for respondents.

Considered and decided by SHUMAKER, Presiding Judge; WILLIS, Judge; and ROSS, Judge.

OPINION

ROSS, Judge.

This is a case about alleged price-fixing under the Minnesota Antitrust Act in the sale of chemicals used in the tire-manufacturing process. In this appeal from judgment on the pleadings for lack of standing, appellant tire-consumer Diane Lorix argues that the district court erred by applying an incorrect standing standard and by determining that her claimed injuries are too remote to confer standing. We conclude that Lorix lacks standing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases