1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 31 A.D.3d
  5. 31 A.D.3d 696 (2006)
 

DICKE v. ANCI

31 A.D.3d 696 (2006)

821 N.Y.S.2d 93

ROBERT DICKE et al., Appellants, v. JAMES RICHARD ANCI et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

July 25, 2006.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

"For a court to conclude as a matter of law that a jury verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence . . . [i]t is necessary to first conclude that there is simply no valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences which could possibly lead rational [people] to the conclusion reached by the jury on the basis of the evidence presented at trial" (Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 N.Y.2d 493

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases