1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 37 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 37 Cal.Rptr.3d 688 (2006)
 

BARAK v. QUISENBERRY LAW FIRM

No. B181029.

37 Cal.Rptr.3d 688 (2006)

135 Cal.App.4th 654

Frederick BARAK, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. The QUISENBERRY LAW FIRM et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

January 10, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Contreras & Campa and Drago Campa, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Murphy Rosen & Cohen, Paul D. Murphy and Katharine A. Kates for Defendants and Respondents The Quisenberry Law Firm, John Quisenberry, Brian Kabateck, Jerilyn Jacobs, and Erin Moore.

Sawyer, Orr & Sawyer, Stephen D. Sawyer, Long Beach, and Jason Robert Sawyer for Defendant and Respondent Michael J. Larivee.

HASTINGS, J.

This appeal results from the grant of a special motion to strike appellant's complaint pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 425.16.1 We find no error and we affirm.

BACKGROUND

Appellant Frederick Barak filed a complaint for malicious prosecution against respondents Michael Larivee, the Quisenberry Law Firm, and certain members of the Quisenberry...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases