STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review,
v.
James Donald TANNEHILL, Petitioner on Review.
Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and Submitted June 20, 2006.
Decided August 3, 2006.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
James N. Varner, Dundee, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner on review.
Seann C. Colgan, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent on review. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.
Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc.
KISTLER, J.
ORS 131.125 (2001)1 sets out the limitation periods within which the state may commence criminal prosecutions. One paragraph of that statute provides that, at the latest, the state must commence a prosecution for third-degree sexual abuse either within four years of the abuse or, if the victim is under 18 years of age when the abuse occurs, within four years of the victim's eighteenth birthday. ORS 131.125(3)(a). Another paragraph...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.