THUESON v. U-HAUL INTERN. INC.

No. A109509.

50 Cal.Rptr.3d 669 (2006)

144 Cal.App.4th 664

David O. THUESON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Five.

November 3, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bradford C. Floyd, Eureka, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Fulbright & Jaworski James R. Evans, Jr., Palo Alto, David M. Liu, Orange County, for Defendants and Respondents.


BRUINIERS, J.*

Following trial by the court, judgment was entered against plaintiff/appellant David O. Thueson and in favor of defendants/respondents U-Haul Co. of California (dba U-Haul Co. of San Francisco) (Y-Haul) on appellant's claims that his dealership agreement was improperly terminated. His claims rested on the premise that the dealership agreement was a franchise, subject to the provisions of the California Franchise Investment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases