1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 37 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 37 Cal.Rptr.3d 680 (2006)
 

BEAL BANK, SSB v. ARTER & HADDEN, LLP

No. B179383.

37 Cal.Rptr.3d 680 (2006)

BEAL BANK, SSB, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ARTER & HADDEN, LLP, et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

January 10, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick, Harvey L. Gould, San Francisco; Carroll, Burdick & McDonough, Vicki L. Freimann, Richard Fannan, Los Angeles, and David M. Rice, San Francisco, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Moscarino & Connolly, John M. Moscarino and Paula C. Greenspan for Defendants and Respondents.

DOI TODD, J.

The question presented is whether the limitations period for a legal malpractice action under Code of Civil Procedure1 section 340.6 is tolled as to an attorney's former law firm and one of its partners while the attorney continues to represent the client in the same subject matter at his new firm. We hold that it is tolled and therefore reverse the judgments of dismissal in favor of the former law firm and its partner following...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases