1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 39 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 39 Cal.Rptr.3d 670 (2006)
 

FRITZ v. EHRMANN

No. B178701.

39 Cal.Rptr.3d 670 (2006)

136 Cal.App.4th 1374

Norman FRITZ, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Sanford M. EHRMANN, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

February 24, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The Mentislaw Group, Dianna M. Worley, and Diane L. Mancinelli, Tustin, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Meyers & McConnell, Frederick S. Reisz, and Jeffrey Francis Allen, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent.

CURRY, J.

Attorney and respondent Sanford M. Ehrmann was sued by his former client, appellant Norman Fritz, for malpractice in connection with a promissory note prepared by Ehrmann in 1995. The malpractice action was filed in 2003, approximately seven months after Ehrmann was replaced as counsel in litigation that ensued over an ambiguity in the note. The court granted Ehrmann's motion for summary judgment on statute of limitations grounds, ruling that the statute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases