1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 25 A.D.3d
  5. 25 A.D.3d 683 (2006)
 

ROMERO v. METROPOLITAN SUBURBAN BUS AUTHORITY

25 A.D.3d 683 (2006)

811 N.Y.S.2d 692

REINA ROMERO et al., Respondents, v. METROPOLITAN SUBURBAN BUS AUTHORITY et al., Appellants. (Action No. 1.) ERIC McLAUGHLIN, Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN SUBURBAN BUS AUTHORITY et al., Appellants. (Action No. 2.) MAUREEN CHILONU, Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN SUBURBAN BUS AUTHORITY et al., Appellants. (Action No. 3.) MARIE MACK, Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN SUBURBAN BUS AUTHORITY, Appellant. (Action No. 4.) MARIA VELASQUEZ et al., Respondents, v. METROPOLITAN SUBURBAN BUS AUTHORITY et al., Appellants. (Action No. 5.) ANA COLATO et al., Respondents, v. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY et al., Appellants. (Action No. 6.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

January 24, 2006.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the facts, with costs, the motion is denied, the verdict is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for entry of an appropriate judgment.

On August 15, 2000, at approximately 7:50 A.M., the plaintiffs were passengers on a bus owned by the defendant MTA — Long Island Bus, sued herein as Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority, and operated by David...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases