AMPEX CORP. v. EASTMAN KODAK CO.

No. CIVA 04-1373 KAJ.

461 F.Supp.2d 230 (2006)

AMPEX CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, and Altek Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

November 2, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David R. Brightman, Gabrielle E. Higgins, James E. Hopenfeld, Karen A. Christiansen, Kelly L. Baxter, Norman H. Beamer, Ray R. Zado, Pro Hac Vice, Jack B. Blumenfeld, Julia Heaney, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, DE, for Plaintiff.

Collins J. Seitz, Jr., Jaclyn Michele Mason, Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz, Wilmington, DE, Michael J. Summersgill, Pro Hac Vice, for Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

JORDAN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is a patent infringement case. Before me is the motion of Plaintiff Ampex Corporation ("Ampex") for partial summary judgment that U.S. Patent No. 4,821,121 (the "'121 patent") is not anticipated by any of the systems that Defendants, Eastman Kodak Company and Altek Corporation (collectively, "Defendants"), allege to be prior art. (Docket Item ["D.I."] 289; the "Motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases