The County Court correctly denied those branches of the defendant's omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and his statements as the product of an illegal arrest. The defendant's conduct in engaging in various transactions with individuals who approached him on the street gave the police an objective, credible reason to approach him (see People v Matienzo,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. HIBBERT
27 A.D.3d 662 (2006)
813 N.Y.S.2d 443
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL HIBBERT, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 21, 2006.
March 21, 2006.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.