1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 143 P.3d
  5. 143 P.3d 546 (2006)
 

ROBUCK v. SAIF CORP.

04-01318; A127199.

143 P.3d 546 (2006)

207 Or. App. 761

In the Matter of the Compensation of Richard E. Robuck, Claimant. Richard E. ROBUCK, Petitioner, v. SAIF CORPORATION and Willoughby Hearing Aid Centers, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 20, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip F. Schuster II, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Dierking & Schuster.

David L. Runner argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and ROSENBLUM, Judges.

ARMSTRONG, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board, contending that the board erred in upholding SAIF's denial of his combined low back condition. We conclude that the board erred and reverse and remand.

The facts are largely undisputed. Claimant has had symptoms in his neck and mid and low back since 1998. On July 2, 2003, he injured his low back at work when he fell. He sought treatment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases