1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 461 F.Supp.2d
  5. 461 F.Supp.2d 226 (2006)
 

AMPEX CORP. v. EASTMAN KODAK CO.

No. CIV.A.04-1373-KAJ.

461 F.Supp.2d 226 (2006)

AMPEX CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY and Altek Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

November 2, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack B. Blumenfeld, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wimington, DE, David. R. Brightman, pro hac vice, Gabrielle E. Higgins, pro hac vice, James E. Hopenfeld, pro hac vice, Julia Heaney, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, DE, Karen A. Christiansen, pro hac vice, Kelly L. Baxter, pro hac vice, Norman H. Beamer, pro hac vice, Ray R. Zado, pro hac vice, for Plaintiff.

Collins J. Seitz, Jr., Jaclyn Michele Mason, Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz, Michael J. Summersgill, pro hac vice, Collins J. Seitz, Jr., Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz, Wilmington, DE, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

JORDAN, District Judge.

I. Introduction

This is a patent infringement suit. Before me are two motions for summary judgment filed by the plaintiff, Ampex Corporation ("Ampex"), that seek a determination that certain evidence upon which defendants Eastman Kodak Company and Altek Corporation (collectively, "Defendants") seek to rely as prior art cannot qualify as such. (Docket Item ["D.I."] 286; D.I. 294.) Background...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases