1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 29 A.D.3d
  5. 29 A.D.3d 656 (2006)
 

O'SULLIVAN v. KIM

29 A.D.3d 656 (2006)

815 N.Y.S.2d 169

DANIEL G. O'SULLIVAN, Respondent, v. MINJAE KIM et al., Defendants, and BYRON S. MARRUGO, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 9, 2006.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The damages awards for past and future pain and suffering do not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see Ramirez v City of New York, 279 A.D.2d 563 [2001]; Berk v Schenck, 122 A.D.2d 823 [1986]).

Further, the award of punitive damages was supported by sufficient evidence since the defendant's conviction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases