SPLATER et al., Appellants,
v.
THERMAL EASE HYDRONIC SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Defendants;
Noveon, Inc., Appellee.
Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 19, 2006.
Decided October 19, 2006.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Cohen Rosenthal & Kramer, L.L.P., Ellen M. Kramer, and Joshua R. Cohen; Tousley Brain Stephens, P.L.L.C., Christopher I. Brain, Beth E. Terrell, Toby J. Marshall, and Michael J. Estok; Christopher R. Casey, P.L.L.C., and Christopher R. Casey; Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, Kristen E. Law, and Jonathan D. Selbin; and Law Office of William Willard and William T. Willard, for appellants.
Miller Nash L.L.P., Daniel A. Brown, and Christine M. Masse; Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren, Ltd., Terrence E. Bishop, and Nicholas Lewandowski, for defendants.
Cecil Marlowe, for appellee.
Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County.
MICHAEL J. CORRIGAN, Judge.
{¶ 1} The issue in this appeal is whether the court abused its discretion by denying plaintiff Durand Splater's motion to compel the production of certain trade secrets held by nonparty Noveon, Inc. Splater sought by subpoena Noveon's formulae for certain antioxidants used by manufacturers of polyethylene ("PEX") tubing. Noveon resisted the subpoena on the grounds that its formulae were trade secrets. In rejecting Splater...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
