Joshua BARDIN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 23, 2006.
February 23, 2006.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Greco Traficante & Edwards, Clyde C. Greco, Jr., Jon S. Brick, San Diego; Gerard, Osuch & Cisneros, Robert B. Gerard; Miller Faucher and Cafferty, Marvin A. Miller, Nyran Rose Pearson, Chicago, IL, and William R. Kane, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
Bryan Cave, Kathy A. Wisniewski, St. Louis, MO, John W. Rogers; Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., Los Angeles and Gregory D. Brown, Oakland, for Defendant and Respondent.
Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson and Sharon J. Arkin, Newport Beach, for Consumer Attorneys of California as Amicus Curiae, upon the request of the Court of Appeal.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Albert N. Shelden, Assistant Attorney General, and Ronald A. Reiter, Deputy Attorney General, as Amicus Curiae.
Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.
OPINION
FYBEL, J.
INTRODUCTION
The trial court sustained defendant Daimlerchrysler Corporation's (DCC) demurrer to plaintiffs' second amended complaint which alleged violations of the unfair competition law (UCL)1 and the Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA),2 and sought declaratory relief. The alleged statutory violations were based on DCC...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
