TAHIR v. PROGRESSIVE CAS INS


12 Misc.3d 657 (2006)

814 N.Y.S.2d 507

MUHAMMAD TAHIR, as Assignee of PAULETTE NOTICE, Plaintiff, v. PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. MUHAMMAD TAHIR, as Assignee of ADAM OSTROVIAK, Plaintiff, v. PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County.

April 18, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Werner, Zaroff, Slotnick, Stern & Ashkenazy, LLP, Lynbrook (Suzette Hyde of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Carman, Callahan & Ingham, LLP, New York City (Jason Tenenbaum of counsel), for defendants.


OPINION OF THE COURT

DIANE A. LEBEDEFF, J.

These two cases were consolidated for trial and center upon a no-fault health services provider's claim for compensation for charges for an electrical diagnostic test identified as current perception threshold testing, also known as sensory nerve conduction threshold testing. Contending that compensation must be denied for these no-fault claims, defendant advances two novel arguments: (1) the medical tests are not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases