Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Initially, we note that the defendant previously appealed from an order dated March 26, 2004. That appeal was dismissed by this Court for failure to prosecute. While the defendant ordinarily would be precluded from relitigating the issues which could have been raised on the prior appeal (see Rubeo v. National Grange Mut. Ins. Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.