DAVIS v. WORKERS' COMP. APPEALS BD.

Nos. H029544, H029834.

51 Cal.Rptr.3d 605 (2006)

145 Cal.App.4th 324

Fortunata Mary DAVIS, Petitioner, v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and Allied Security et al., Respondents. Moises Torres, Petitioner, v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board and Williams Tank Lines et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeal of California, Sixth District.

November 30, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Russell D. Jacobson, San Jose, Butts & Johnson, for Petitioner, Fortunata Mary Davis.

Michael P. Holmes, San Diego, Laughlin, Falbo, Levy & Moresi, for Respondent, Allied Security.

David J. Froba, for Amicus Curiae for Petitioner, California Applicants' Attorney Association.

Leah D. Davis, Office of the County Counsel, for Amicus Curiae for Respondent, County of Los Angeles.

Jim Gonzalez, The Law Offices of Jim Gonzalez, for Petitioner, Moises Torres.

Marshall G. Candee, San Jose, Law Offices of Marshall Candee, for Respondent, Williams Tank Lines.


PREMO, Acting P.J.

I. Introduction

The question in these workers' compensation cases is whether the Legislature's 2004 overhaul of the workers' compensation statutes (Stats. 2004 (2003-2004 Reg. Sess.) ch. 34, p. 142 et seq.) was intended to alter the formula used to calculate a permanent disability award when the employee's overall disability is subject to apportionment. We conclude that, notwithstanding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases