MORALES v. RILEY


28 A.D.3d 623 (2006)

813 N.Y.S.2d 518

RAMONA MORALES et al., Appellants, v. DIONNE RILEY, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

April 18, 2006.


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law and the facts, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for the entry of an appropriate amended judgment in accordance herewith.

"To acquire an easement by prescription, it must be shown that the use was hostile, open and notorious, and continuous and uninterrupted for the prescriptive period" of 10 years (Asche v. Land & Bldg. Known as 64-29 232nd St.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases