1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 454 F.3d
  5. 454 F.3d 187 (2006)
 

U.S. v. KING

No. 05-1728.

454 F.3d 187 (2006)

UNITED STATES of America v. Donald James KING, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Filed July 11, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David L. McColgin (Argued), Defender Association of Philadelphia, Federal Court Division, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant.

Lesley B. Fitzgerald, Peter D. Hardy (Argued), Office of United States Attorney Philadelphia, PA.

Before SLOVITER, AMBRO and MICHEL, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.

If the procedural requirements for sentencing defendants that this court established are so inflexible that we cannot affirm any sentence when the district court fails to articulate its analysis in precisely the terms of those requirements, then we must vacate the sentence imposed in this case no matter how reasonable we believe it is. Under the circumstances of this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases