1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. B.R.
  4. 343 B.R.
  5. 343 B.R. 297 (2006)
 

IN RE OPTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Bankruptcy Nos. 96-00805-8P1, 96-01200-8P1, 96-01201-8P1, 96-01202-8P1, 96-01203-8P1, 98-02134-8P1, 98-02135-8P1, 98-02136-8P1, Adversary No. 02-110.

343 B.R. 297 (2006)

In re OPTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RECOMM Enterprises, Inc., RECOMM Operations, Inc., RECOMM International Display Corp. Ltd., Automated Travel Center, Inc., RECOMM International Display Corp., RECOMM International Display, Ltd., RECOMM International Corp., Debtors. Finova Capital Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Jon Martin, Individually, and Ancha, Inc., Doing Business As Roger Pharmacy, Defendants.

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division.

February 3, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John D. Goldsmith, Trenam, Kemker, Scharf, et al., Tampa, FL, for Debtors.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING FINOVA CAPITAL CORPORATION'S RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY

ALEXANDER L. PASKAY, Bankruptcy Judge.

(Doc. No. 63 and 68)

THE MATTERS under consideration in these confirmed Chapter 11 cases of Optical Technologies, Inc., and its several affiliates, collectively referred to as the RECOMM Debtors, are Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 63) and a Renewed Motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases