1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.3d
  4. 12 Misc.3d
  5. 12 Misc.3d 627 (2006)
 

BARONOFF v. KEAN DEV. CO.

12 Misc.3d 627 (2006)

818 N.Y.S.2d 421

STEVEN BARONOFF et al., Petitioners, v. KEAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC., et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Nassau County.

April 11, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lamb & Barnosky, LLP, Melville, for petitioners.

Meltzer, Lippe & Goldstein, P.C., Mineola, for Kean Development Company, Inc., respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

EDWARD W. McCARTY, III, J.

Petition brought by order to show cause for a judgment staying two arbitrations demanded by respondent, and cross motion by respondent for an order imposing sanctions against petitioners pursuant to 22 NYCRR part 130, are decided as set forth herein.

On June 11, 2004, petitioners entered into a construction management agreement with respondent Kean Development...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases