W54-7 LLC v. SCHICK


14 Misc.3d 49 (2006)

829 N.Y.S.2d 399

W54-7 LLC, Appellant, v. WALTER SCHICK, Respondent, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

December 14, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Novick, Edelstein, Lubell, Reisman, Wasserman & Leventhal, P.C., Yonkers (Lawrence Schiro of counsel), for appellant.

Sperber Denenberg & Kahan, P.C., New York City (Jacqueline Handel-Harbour and Steven B. Sperber of counsel), for Walter Schick, respondent.

McCOOE, J.P., DAVIS and GANGEL-JACOB, JJ., concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Order, entered June 30, 2005, affirmed, with $10 costs.

Tenant's pretrial motion to dismiss the holdover petition was properly granted, there being no serious dispute that landlord's service by mail of the 10-day notice to cure was untimely under the rule enunciated in Matter of ATM One v Landaverde (2 N.Y.3d 472 [2004])....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases