GOSS INTERN. AMERICAS, INC. v. MAN ROLAND, INC.

Civil No. 03-cv-513-SM. Opinion No. 2006 DNH 088.

443 F.Supp.2d 187 (2006)

GOSS INTERNATIONAL AMERICAS, INC., Plaintiff v. MAN ROLAND, INC. and MAN Roland Druckmaschinen AG, Defendants. MAN Roland, Inc. and MAN Roland Druckmaschinen AG, Counterclaim Plaintiffs v. Goss International Americas, Inc. and Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG, Counterclaim Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire.

July 31, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel E. Will, Danielle Leah Pacik, Jonathan M. Shirley, Devine Millimet & Branch PA, Manchester, NH, Georg C. Reitboeck, Mark A. Hannemann, Michael J. Lennon, Richard S. Gresalfi, Kenyon & Kenyon, New York City, Hugh T. Lee, Lee Law Office, Derry, NH, T. Cy Walker, Kenyon & Kenyon, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.

Alfred H. Hemingway, Jr., Martin B. Pavane, Sidney R. Bresnick, Teodor J. Holmberg, Richard D. Margiano, Cohen Pontani Lieberman & Pavane, John F. Sweeney, Steven F. Meyer, Tony V. Pezzano, Morgan & Finnegan LLP, New York City, Irvin D. Gordon, Sulloway & Hollis, Concord, NH, Michael J. Songer, Shari Ross Lahlou, Crowell & Moring, Washington, DC, for Defendants.

Mark A. Hannemann, Kenyon & Kenyon, Seth J. Atlas, Morgan & Finnegan LLP, New York City, Daniel E. Will, Devine Millimet & Branch PA, Bruce W. Felmly, Anthony S. Augeri, McLane Graf Raulerson & Middleton, Manchester, NH, for Counterclaim Defendants.

Michael J. Songer, Shari Ross Lahlou, Crowell & Moring, Washington, DC, Irvin D. Gordon, Sulloway & Hollis, Concord, NH, Alfred H. Hemingway, Jr., Martin B. Pavane, Richard D. Margiano, Sidney R. Bresnick, Teodor J. Holmberg, Cohen Pontani Lieberman & Pavane, New York City, for Counterclaim Plaintiffs.


ORDER

MCAULIFFE, Chief Judge.

In document no. 150, Goss moves for summary judgment on each of its three claims of patent infringement against MAN Roland. More specifically, Goss argues that MAN Roland's Rotoman S offset lithographic press, which includes printing blankets produced by Reeves and MacDermid, infringes claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 6,386,100 (the '100 patent), claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 6,739,251 (the '251 patent), and claim 1 of U.S. Patent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases