1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 30 A.D.3d
  5. 30 A.D.3d 594 (2006)
 

IN THE MATTER OF CARLINO v. SCHEYER

30 A.D.3d 594 (2006)

817 N.Y.S.2d 375

In the Matter of DOMENICA M. CARLINO, Appellant, v. RICHARD I. SCHEYER et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

June 20, 2006.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Zoning boards have broad discretion in considering applications for area variances, and a zoning board's determination should not be set aside unless there is a showing of, inter alia, arbitrariness (see Matter of Pecoraro v Board of Appeals of Town of Hempstead, 2 N.Y.3d 608, 613 [2004]; Matter of Ifrah v Utschig, 98 N.Y.2d 304...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases