In the Matter of the Investigation of Whether Qwest Corporation is in Compliance with the Investment Requirements of its Amended Alternative Form of Regulation Plan,
QWEST CORPORATION, Appellant,
v.
NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION, Appellee, and
General Services Department of the State of New Mexico, Intervenor.
Supreme Court of New Mexico.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 29, 2006.
Rehearing Denied September 19, 2006.
As Revised September 25, 2006.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Montgomery & Andrews, P.A., Thomas W. Olson, Sarah M. Singleton, Santa Fe, NM, Hogan & Hartson, L.L.P., Peter A. Rohrbach, H. Christopher Bartolomucci, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.
Margaret Caffey-Moquin, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee.
Merrill, Arnone & Jones, L.L.P., Richard H. Levin, Santa Rosa, CA, for Intervenor.
Supreme Court of New Mexico.
OPINION
SERNA, Justice.
{1} The Public Regulation Commission (the PRC) regulates all telecommunication carriers in New Mexico. Pursuant to this authority, the PRC approved a five-year alternative form of regulation (AFOR) plan for Qwest Corporation, one such carrier. Qwest, PRC staff and other parties actively negotiated and endorsed the AFOR plan. During the plan's third year, the PRC investigated whether Qwest was in compliance with a key...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
