1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 133 P.3d
  5. 133 P.3d 487 (2006)
 

STATE v. GEORGE

Nos. 55312-7-I, 55313-5-I.

133 P.3d 487 (2006)

132 Wash.App. 654

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. John S. GEORGE, and Tommy B. George, and each of them, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

May 1, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey H. Smith, Law Offices of Jeffrey H. Smith, Seattle, for Appellants.

Patrick Preston, McKay Chadwell, PLLC and Michael P. Mohandeson, King County Prosecutors Office, Seattle, for Respondent.

ELLINGTON J.

¶1 Tommy and John George advertised a truck for sale. Police thought their ad sounded too good to be true. After a sting operation, the Georges were convicted of attempted first degree theft by deception. They challenge the sufficiency of the evidence, emphasizing the absence of proof of the market value of the truck. They also contend that two of the governing definitional statutes are unconstitutionally vague. We hold that the evidence was sufficient...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases