Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony. There is no requirement that a defendant in a lineup be surrounded by individuals who are nearly identical to him in appearance (see People v Chipp,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.