PEOPLE v. PINCKNEY


27 A.D.3d 581 (2006)

811 N.Y.S.2d 751

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. COMFORT PINCKNEY, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 14, 2006.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's challenges to remarks made by the prosecutor during summation are unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Antinuche, 5 A.D.3d 390 [2004]). In any event, most of the remarks constituted a fair response to the defense counsel's summation in which he repeatedly challenged the credibility of the prosecution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases